|
DAWN SIMULATION THERAPY
Langston
Hughes |
![]() |
Apparatus for DDS delivery varies widely in design and adherence to the outdoor naturalistic pattern. Choice of lamp and fixture is important, with the goal of bathing the sleeping area in a diffuse light signal that will reach the eyes as sleeping posture varies. The initial demonstration of DDS therapy in the late 1980’s was by Drs. Michael Terman and David Schlager at Columbia*, using a complex mechanical device in which a precision motor rotated a set of vanes in front of a fluorescent light box, operating like a computer-controlled venetian blind. Although the mechanics were cumbersome, several important effects were noted:
The authors concluded that "twilight exposure appears able to promote circadian phase adjustments, morning melatonin suppression, regularized sleep patterns, and antidepressant responses. This represents the first indication in humans of physiological and/or behavioral sensitivity to such light signals." Underscoring the logic of DDS vs. bright light therapy, the authors continued, "We hypothesize that non-modulated bright light constitutes a supernormal stimulus [that is, a stimulus with higher intensity than required under natural conditions]. The eyes may be primed at twilight hours for reception of changing intensities of low-level light." More recent DDS apparatus, suitable for home treatment, utilizes electronic controls and shielded incandescent/halogen lamps (see photo). Treatment strategies include choosing an optimum clock time for simulated sunrise or a desired calendar date. In one popular strategy, the user specifies the desired sleep length (for example, 7.5 hours), and the microprocessor "finds" a location on earth matching this nighttime duration at the summer solstice, and drives the lamps accordingly. In starting DDS therapy, users need to determine effective combinations of maximum light intensity, twilight duration and timing. Most prefer a sunrise of around 300 lux, but others require lower levels to forestall premature awakening. Far lower levels are often preferred for the dusk signal. Several
inexpensive “light alarm clocks” have been marketed, cloning
the DDS concept, but with rapid dawn ramps (far faster than natural
dawns) and restricted fields of illumination. These mass-market products
have not yet received adequate clinical evaluation. Copyright
© 2002 CET |
|